Analyze research impact by calculating h-index, g-index, and fractional citation metrics based on your publication data.
h-index: The largest number h such that h publications have at least h citations each.
Formula: \( h = \max(i) \text{ s.t. } C_i \geq i \)
g-index: The largest number g where the top g articles have received at least \( g^2 \) citations combined.
Formula: \( g = \max(i) \text{ s.t. } \sum_{j=1}^{i} C_j \geq i^2 \)
Fractional h-index: Citations are divided by the number of authors before calculating the index to account for individual contribution.
Data: A researcher has 5 papers with citations: 10, 8, 5, 4, 3.
In the competitive world of academia and scientific research, measuring performance is crucial for tenure reviews, grant applications, and career advancement. The Research Productivity Calculator is a specialized bibliometric tool designed to help researchers, department heads, and academic evaluators quantify the impact of scientific output. Unlike simple publication counts, which ignore quality, or total citation counts, which can be skewed by a single "hit" paper, this tool calculates robust metrics that balance productivity with citation impact.
The most prominent metric calculated is the h-index, proposed by physicist Jorge E. Hirsch. The h-index has become the industry standard for evaluating the cumulative impact of a researcher's scholarly output and performance. By definition, a scholar with an index of h has published h papers each of which has been cited in other papers at least h times. This metric is robust because it discounts the disproportionate weight of highly cited papers and ignores papers with no citations. Our Research Productivity Calculator automates the sorting and ranking process required to find this number instantly.
Beyond the h-index, this tool offers the g-index and Fractional h-index. The g-index, proposed by Leo Egghe, gives credit for citations of highly cited papers that the h-index ignores. It is particularly useful for senior researchers with a few seminal works. Furthermore, modern research is increasingly collaborative. The Fractional h-index calculation provided by the Research Productivity Calculator helps address the "co-authorship" inflation by normalizing citation counts based on the number of contributors. This provides a fairer assessment of individual contribution in large research teams. For more information on these bibliometrics, you can visit Wikipedia's H-index entry or explore resources from the Metrics Toolkit.
Whether you are a PhD student tracking your early progress or a tenured professor preparing a dossier, the Research Productivity Calculator provides the quantitative data needed to benchmark your success.
Explore all remaining calculators in this Education & Training category.
Explore specialized calculators for your industry and use case.
A "good" h-index varies significantly by field and career stage. In physics, an h-index of 20 might be typical for a newly tenured professor, whereas in social sciences, it might be lower due to different citation cultures. Always compare your metrics with peers in your specific discipline.
The h-index ignores the actual number of citations once they exceed the rank (e.g., a paper with 100 citations counts the same as one with 10 citations if the h-index is 10). The g-index gives more weight to highly cited papers, allowing a few blockbuster publications to boost the score.
Standard metrics treat every author on a paper equally (everyone gets 1 credit). The Fractional h-index divides the credit. If a paper has 10 citations and 5 authors, each author effectively gets 2 citations for that paper in the calculation. This prevents inflation from joining large author lists without significant contribution.
Yes, as long as the data represents a countable output (like patents or software downloads) and a "citation" or usage metric, the mathematical logic of the h-index applies to measure consistency and impact.